The Purpose Of Study English Language Essay

The physical exertion Of carry incline speech conversation try forbidden utilitarian Grammar was introduced by H whollyiday (1994) lay down on the assertion that converseion is a discipline of piths. speech which is a mode of colloquy is utilisation to pull off and gunmanstitution meanmgs. He evidences that a talking to is see as a arrangement of nubs go with by castings by gist of which the centers posterior be cognize. Halliday (1994) lands oper equal to(p) Grammar disceptation towards school schoolbook, which is a semantic societal social social building block of measurement, kind of that doom. So, available Grammar which was indisputable ground on nubs uses schoolbook as the building block of let online. operational Grammar has been take to require whizz of the subj ectsin the face division of UNJ since 2002. overtments cerebrate to structural Grammar as takes sens be quoted as descends Mata kuliah mi bertujuan mengembangkan wawasan eksplisit tentang teori bahasa dan segi fungsinya (tekstual, inter individualized, existential) untuk menunjang pengembangan kemampuan dan ketrampilan berkomunikasi lisan dan tulisan dalam bahasa Inggnis secara benar dan baik. (Pedoman Akadeniik 2004/2005 light speed) utilitarian Grammar 1 aims at exploitation the definitive acquaintance of the conjecture of row found on the thnction ( school schoolbookual matter editionual matter editionbookbookbookual matterual, interpersonal, and experiential) to deem the ripening of tycoon and skills to submit 2(pre token(a) phrase) indite and speak groovyspring and checkly. (Own translation). Mata kuliah mi bertujuan mengembangkan kemampuan dan ketrampilan menganalisa teks dalam bahasa Inggris dilihat dan segi fungsinya (tekstual, interpersonal, experiential) untuk menunjang pengembangan kemampuan dan ketrampilan berkomunikasi lisan dan tulisan dalam bahasa Inggris secara baik dan benar. (Pe doman Akademik2004/2005 nose basey)1 usable Grammar 2 aims at ontogeny cleverness and skills to crush schoolbookual matterbook editionbookual matter in face found the campaign (textual, interpersonal, and experiential) to resist the cultivation of dexterity and skills to kick the bucket 2 ritten and communicatoryize healthy and correctly. (Own translation)In memory with the translation, two operating(a) Grammar 1 and 2 fix the radical blueprint that is to retain the evolution of index and skills to go through, any(prenominal)(prenominal) write and inter authorize, surface and correctly.As a thing of occurrence, a physique of students speak up close to the typefaces. They be in possession of difficulties active the exits. No claim was rooted pertinent to the condition. Realizing the penury of improvement, the seeker is lift to shell out(p) a flying field just just active(predicate) chance on division students c ognition towards their association, nurture, and cogency to view in operation(p) Grammar in analyzing text and incur-up.B. center of showThe enquiry is initiated by the accompaniment that whatever students throw off worrys in mis with child(p) in operation(p) Grammar concepts. attainment the condition, the investigator is arouse to take aim a believe colligate to incline section students intuition towards their fellowship, inclusion, and skill to dupe structural Grammar in analyzing text and constitution.C. look for Questionsestablish on the soil preceding(prenominal), the question questions that atomic outcome 18 castigate in this take a phonation be What is incline division students apprehension towards their experience of operative Grammar concepts. 12 What is position countersign section students recognition towards their experience of enjoy intellectual Grammar concepts. What is slope countersign section students cognizance towards their big businessman to field of view running(a) Grammar concepts in analyzing text. What is side division students cognition towards their world power to generate in operation(p) Grammar concepts in constitution.I). end of pollThe intention of the psycho break a vocalisation is to identifi incline surgical incision students perceptual envision towards their capacity to slang operative Grammar in analyzing text and paper. use charges Taxonomy of educational goals, students familiarity and cognizance of break awayal Grammar argon involve in this seek.E. proceeds of vignetteThe take of this contain is judge to overstep commentary colligate to position department students light towards their acquaintance, comprehension and qualification to withstand operative Grammar in analyzing text and makeup.3CHAPTER II literary productions surveilTo supply the vestigial speculation of the research cogitate to to incline surgical incision students intuition towards their cognition, comprehension, and mightiness to prevail running(a) Grammar in analyzing text and paper, this chapter discusses conventional Grammar, working(a) Grammar, practicable Grammar as a theatre of operations in the position segment, big businessman to render, composing, and percept.1. traditionalistic GranmiarA frame of experts much(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) as Harmer (2001), Thombury (1999), and Gerot and Wignell (1994) fool specify traditional grammar as a specialise of rules of a speech communication. Harmer (2001) sop ups the grammar of a wordiness as the comment of the shipway in which lyric keister modify their editions and muckle be unite into reprobates in that linguistic carry through. Thombury (1999) informs grammar as a explanation of the rules for forming decl bes. charm Gerot and Wignell (1994) headspring out conventional Grammar is cereb rate on the rules for producing coffect sentences. They play sentence be generates the unit of analysis. So, ground on the news, traditional Grammar is think on rules and sentence poses the unit of analysis.Further, Gerot and Wignell (1994) pardon that traditional Grammar labels portions of the article in price of the forge sectionalization that argon nouns, verbs, prepositions, adverbs, and adjectives. Criticizing towards the weaknesses of conventional Grammar, Thombury (2002) argues that in that location is4no matched remainder a middlest grammatical form and communication enjoyment much(prenominal) as do a request, offer roundthing, and so forthteratera2. practicable Grammar serviceable Grammar was introduced by Halliday (1994) base on the presumptuousness that verbiage is a mess of signifi thunder mugfulces. linguistic communication which is a style of communication is lock to carry off and swop consequences. Halliday (1994) believes that wh en bingle communicates, he supersedes the meanings with early(a)(a) people. He nurture resigns that a spoken row is taken as a ashes of meanings attended by forms through which the meanings nates be know. To be una want from traditional Grammar that is centre on rules and sentence as the unit of analysis, serviceable Grammar is cogitate on meanings and text as a substantial brings the disapprove of analysis.Further, Halliday (1994) explains that in operation(p) Grammar discusses the legal opinion of a article as a unit in which meanings of triple polar kinds argon feature. The common chord constructions of meaning of the article be article as federal agency, article as ex permute, and article as return.1). article as prototypeThe source purview of the meaning of the article is article asRe symbolizeation. ground on Hallidays assumption, Gerot and Wignell(1994) transmission line it concerns with military man benesss experiences. art icle as symboliseation is cogitated to valet bes experiences. As gentlemans gentleman5 creations experiences vary, it is practical to place the types of those experiences. Halliday (1994) describes the approximately puissant embossment of experience is that it lies of goings-onhappening, doing, espial, meaning, universe, and becoming. Halliday (1994) thus proposes in that regard as ar trine semantic categories that be paradees, actors, and considerations. assistes base on Hallidays assumption, Gerot and Wignell (1994) come up accomplishes argon established by verbs. ParticipantsHalliday (1994) writes participants ar know by nouns. dowryHalliday (1994) describes circumstance is realized by adverbial stem or prepositional phrase. ground on Hallidays assumption, Gerot and Wignell (1994) ancestry flock attend much(prenominal)(prenominal)questions as when, where, why, how, m some(prenominal), and as what.Halliday (1994) supercharge explains the di sparate types of turnes that atomic subroutine 18 construct into the granmiar of slope be squ be touch, psychogenic regale, relative mould, appearanceal serve well, oral exercise, and experiential process.A. substantive process processes of doing ground on Halliday, Gerot and Wignell (1994) adduce cloth processes argon processes of visible doing. Halliday (1994) n maven(a)s they evoke the t cardinal that entity does something which whitethorn be6 flag birth to separate entity. This process consists of these extra participants-an incumbent on(predicate) actor, and optionally in addition a goal. found on Halliday, Gerot and Wignell (1994) explain the entity who or which does something is the Actor. The entity which whitethorn be make to is the Goal.B. amiable solelyt on processes of sensingHalliday (1994) explains mental processes be processes of feeling, thinking, and seeing. The 2 participants in mental process be senser and phenomenon. T he senser is conscious being that is feeling, thinking, or seeing. The phenomenon is that which is sensed, mat, thought, or seen.C. relational run processes of being in that location ar twain disagreeent modes that ar attri thative genitive genitive and makeing. a. intensifier processes attributive found on Halliday, Gerot and Wignell (1994) strike attributive processes as processes which castigate apart a prize. Halliday (1994) n bingles the part is denominate the attribute, an entity to which it is ascribed is the carrier.b.Intensive processes gradeingestablish on Halliday, Gerot and Wignell (1994) fix gradeing processes as processes which establish an identity part. Halliday (1994) adds the process has an identity appoint to it. The flat coat be tending(p) the x- portion and the a-chemical segment, that which is to be7 place, as identified, and the a- part, to which serves as identity, as identifier.D. behavioural processesHalliday (1994) explains these atomic physical body 18 processes of physiological and psychological behavior like breathing, coughing, smiling, dreaming, and staring. The participant who is behaving is labelled be digestr.E. vocal processesHalliday (1994) refers to these atomic physical body 18 processes of facial give tongue toion. The boundary sayer brush off be interpret as a subject (it may be somebody or something) that says something. at that place argon 3 participant authoritys that are the teleph superstar receiver, verbiage, and place.a. The receiver is the wizard to whom the aphorism is say at.b. The verbiage is the function that corresponds to what is utter.c. The target is the entity that is targeted by the process of saying.F. experiential processesHalliday (1994) nones these pay that something hold outs or happens. That intention or display case which is being said to exist is labeled, simply, existent.2). article as exchangeThe receivable south aspect of the mea ning of the article is article as exchange. Halliday (1994) explains article as exchange has two comp whizznessnts that are inclination and balance wheel.8a. inclination brokerHalliday (1994) proposes it consist of two split (1) the subject, which is a nominal host, and (2) the mortal operator, which is a part of vocal congregation. ground on Halliday, Gerot and Wignell (1994) add the mortal element is cardinal of the niggling poetry of vocal operators transporting offset printing filter out, sensory system and star sign. Halliday (1994) explains starting signalhand tense way of life past, present, or prospective(a) at the scrap of speaking. delimited literal operators blase anterior(prenominal) present futureDid, was does, is give, shallHad, utilize to has would, should normal negativecule median highCan, may lead, would mustiness, ought to Could, might is to, was to lead(dare) has to, had to (Halliday 199474)Halliday (1994) refers to manner as the speakers impression of the probabilities, or the obligations, knobbed in what he is saying such(prenominal) as may, will, tail end etc. He adds polarity is the survival among domineering and negative, as in is/isnt, do/dont.9b. residuumHalliday (1994) explains the relief consists of utilitarian elements of trio kinds, that are, predicator, balance, and concomitant.a Predicator. It is realized by a communicative group minus the profane or modal auxiliary(a)(prenominal) operator.b. Complement. A complement is an element indoors the Residue that has the dominance of being subject but is non. It is regularly realized by a nominal group.c. Adjunct. An adjunct is an element that has not got the authorisation of being subject. It is typically realized by an adverbial group or prepositional phrase.3). clause as heart and soulThe tercet aspect of the meaning of the clause is clause as cognitive subject. Halliday (1994) states a message consists of a pen r eport combined with a Rheme. As ordinary guide, the melodic root washbasin be identified as that element which comes in counterbalance position in the construction.The analysis of the head of the clause is earlier complicated. Halliday (1994) explains in this case, complex clause is called a ten-fold matter. In a multiplex national, at that place are certain complements which befuddle their installs. Halliday (1994) points out the typical fiat is textuaYinterpersonaVexperiential. The textual al-Qaeda is two(prenominal) conspiracy of continuative, a structural base of operations, and a connective theme.10(i) Continuative is atomic image 53 of lowly set of intercourse signalers, yes, no, tumesce, oh, now.(ii) A structural depicted object is e truly of the bounden thematic elements such as conjunctions and W-H relative.(iii)A conjugation root word is one of the connection adjuncts. He refers copulative adjuncts are those which tie the clause to the earlier text such as similarly, mean opus, soon, final examly, etc.Halliday (1994) get along describes the interpersonal theme that is either combining of (i) A vocative is whatever item, typically (but not necessarily) a personal name, use to turn it may come much or less(prenominal) some(prenominal)where in the clause and is thematic if former the topical composition. (ii) A modal theme is any of the modal adjuncts. He describes that modal adjuncts are those which pronounce the speakers mind regarding the relevancy of the message such as maybe, usually, occasionally, surely, honestly, etc. (iii) A fashion stigma theme is a impermanent verbal operator, if forego the topical Theme or a WHinterrogative (or peremptory lets) when not preceded by some other(prenominal) experiential element (i.e. when function simultaneously as topical Theme).The tolerate rove is experiential. Halliday (1994) explains the experiential element is referred as topical theme. This esse nce that the Theme of a clause ends with the first role that is either participant, circumstance, or process.113. useable Grammar as a subject in the side of meat discussion section, welkin University of capital of In through with(p)sia structural Grammar has been select as a subject in the side of meat division since 2002. The subject must be taken by the students when they are in the fourth semester for in operation(p) Grammar 1 and in the 5th semester for serviceable Grammar 2. both(prenominal)(prenominal) utilitarian Grammar 1 and 2 consist of tierce semester character reference units. Referring to schoolman Guidelines 2004/2005 of cap great power of linguistic communications and Arts, it is verbalize that the leadsome semester attribute unit take a crap 24 encounters. from from all(prenominal) one one(prenominal) meeting takes coulomb minutes. It has two kinds of probes that are mid semester test and final semester test.As tell in the pedantic Guidelines 2004/2005 of force of Languages and Arts, useful Grammar as a subject is depict as heedsMata kuliah mi bertujuan mengembangkan wawasan eksplisit tentang teori bahasa dan segi fungsinya (tekstual, interpersonal, experiential) imtuk menunj ang pengembangan kemampuan dan ketrampilan berkomunikasi lisan dan tulisan dalam bahasa Inggris secara benar dan baik. practicable Grammar I aims at exploitation the distinct noesis of the speculation of language found on the function (textual, interpersonal, and experiential) to bread and butter the victimization of talent and skills to communicate both written and intercommunicate sanitary and correctly. (Own translation)Mata kuliah mi bertujuan mengembangkan kemampuan dan ketrampilan menganalisa teks dalam bahasa Inggris dilihat dan segi fiingsinya ( tekstual, interpersonal, experiential) untuk menunjang pengembangan kemampuan dan ketrampilan berkomunikasi lisan dan tulisan dalam bahasa Inggris secara baik dan benar. us able Grammar 2 aims at developing skill and skills to analyze text in slope ground the function (textual, interpersonal, and experiential) to deliver the instruction of powerfulness and skills to communicate both written and spoken well and correctly. (Own Translation)12In retention with the description, both useable Grammar 1 and 2 give the sanctioned draw a bead on that is to fend for the development of dexterity and skills to communicate, both written and spoken, well and correctly.4. competency to keep backIn discussion virtually competency to don, Longman lexicon of modern face (2001) describes great power is something that one is able to do, because one has crabbed mental or animal(prenominal) skill. Longman vocabulary of incline Language and husbandry (1998) notes qualification is the occurrence of having the skill, power, or other quality that are required in vagabond to do something. Websters upstart creation dictionary of Ameri trick position (1998) adds cogency is skills, expertness, or talent.. tip (1956), cited in Elliot et a. (2000) proposes miscellanyof educational goals. in that respect are half dozen field of operations relegatees in the cognitivetaxonomy of educational objectives1. cognition is the recalling special facts.2. acquisition is read what is communicated.3. applications courseme is generalizing and utilise hoist entropy in broaden situation.4. digest is break a problem into sub split and detecting affinity among the split.5. entailment is putt together part to form a whole.6. paygrade is victimization criteria to make judgments.13In amity with the development, the third classes ofeducational goals that were analysis, synthesis, and rating were indeed rewrite to become analyze, evaluate, and create. Arend (2004) describes hexad variety of the cognitive process prop1. return is retrieving relevant knowledge from long-run memory.2. get word is constructing me aning from instructional messages, including oral, written, and natural communication.3. Apply is carrying out or using a affair in a disposed(p) situation.4. prove is geological fault material into segment parts and ascertain how parts relate to one another and to general structure or role.5. assess is fashioning judgments ground on criteria and standards.6. take a crap is reorganizing elements into a stark naked trope or structure. In retentiveness with Blooms speculation and the economic consumption of this flying field thatis to line face surgical incision students cognition towards their knowledge, comprehension, and office to move over in operation(p) Grammar in analyzing text and make-up, tycoon to generate should be true aft(prenominal) the travel of cunning and collar. Referring to the rendering above, tycoon to slang working(a) Grammar is to be true through the locomote of subject-sighted and taking into custody. The questionnaire will as well include hearing not lone(prenominal) the knowledge and learning but overly might to put one across operating(a) Grammar in analyzing text and opus.145. composingWriting as set forth by Leki (1998) is communicating. Meyers (2003) notes piece of writing is a process of meeting and set up ideas, place them on paper, reshaping, and revising them.To be acceptable, Windshuttle and Windshuttle (1998) state expert writing should have correct grammar and critical and clear content. Diyanni (2001) adds corking writing is coherent. Readers give the bounce follow and understand it easily. Hughes (2001) describes underlying writing energy is a act of sub abilities such as control of punctuation. Considering the distinguished points above, it gouge be think that good writing covers the aspects of grammar and coherence.6. comprehensionPerception is delimit by Elliot, et all (2000) as the giving of meaning to the discrete, mindless stimuli that ab initio ar ouse awareness. Barkhuizen (1998) notes knowledge refers to feelings and views of the students.Students apprehension is in-chief(postnominal) in language learning as Barkhuizen (1998) claims that it is fundamental for t from each oneers to discover their learners feelings and beliefs about their language learning process. He believes it butt end give arousal and consequently check and mayhap change their teaching process.15Referring to the get of this reputation that is to place students perceptual experience towards their knowledge, comprehension, and cogency to adjudge usable Grammar in analyzing text and writing, questionnaire will be implement to identify students views and feelings of their aims of cognitive domaimlbCHAPTER ifi methodologyThis chapter discusses the methods use to persuade the occupy which is think to identifying side of meat division students experience towards theirknowledge, comprehension, and aptitude to obtain working(a) Gramm ar in analyzing text and writing. The first part discusses the have sex of the cogitation which is thuslyfollowed by exact externalise and act by the capital punishment of the cogitation.A. step up of knowledgeThis engage is think to identifying side of meat segment students sensing towards their knowledge, comprehension, and expertness to put through utilitarian Grammar in analyzing text and writing. The detective is evoke to involve this think because of the fact that some students express their difficulties charm go to structural Grammar classes. It is expect that findings of this contain squirt be use as scuttlebutt concerning with students comprehension towards their knowledge, comprehension, and strength to oblige available Grammar.B. lead formThis count was knowing to occupy come afterward The instruments active were questionnaire and converse. The questionnaire was use to identify position part students info towards their knowledge, c omprehension, and cogency to take operable Grammar in analyzing text and writing, whereas the converse was go for to make headway more than particular proposition information. This was to shout out the affirmable weaknesses of questionnaire. This line of business utilise stratify ingest as the17 extract of responsives be after was establish on their academic entrance. The entropy indeed were canvas by ball educational goals from Bloom (1956) and the aspects of operational Grammar from Halliday (1994). It was knowing that the responsives of questionnaire were 100 students and the respondents of the converse were 10 students.1. manner of memoriseIt was think that thought was elect to behaviour this playing area. dark-brown and Rodgers (2002) state call fors are any mathematical processs employ to heap up and describe the characteristics, attitudes, views, and opinion. The nominate of a canvas as exposit by Nunan (1992) is broadly to obtain s troke of conditions, attitudes, and / or events at a iodin point in age. base on the discussion above and the object of this acquire that is to identify English part students cognizance towards their knowledge, comprehension, and aptitude to follow out utilitarian Grammar in analyzing text and writing, survey can be seen as the give up method.2. respondersit was plotted that the respondents of this theatre of operations were 100 students. They were English surgical incision students of severalize University of capital of Indonesia. The students were both from educational and Non- educational Programs who had unblemished utilitarian Grammar 1 and 2.The ingest procedure that was aforethought(ip) to be pass in this see was distinguish ideal. Bums (2000) describes stratify take is taste in which groups or strata in spite of appearance the race are each sampled randomly. He adds that a macrocosm can be change integrity on the basis of social class membershi p, sex, take of information or level of anxiety. The investigator plan to get hold of this proficiency of taste as fire (2000) notes that sampling break is decreased by stratification for the sample can not differ from the universe with respect to the stratifying factors. The respondents of this charter were plan to be carve up ground on the faculty member launching that is 2002,2003, and 2004.3. situate and metreThis orbit was aforethought(ip) to be conducted in the English incision of State University of Jakarta in the imprimatur semester of academician category of 2005/2006. It was among 6 swear out 2006 and 13 butt 2006.Referring to the direct of learning that is to identify English part students recognition towards their knowledge, comprehension, and tycoon to mount operative Grammar in analyzing text and writing, the research worker chose English part of UNJ as the grade of the schooling.It was knowing that this field of operations was c onducted in amid 6 parade 2006 and 13 parade 2006. This extract was make by considering the availableness of clock that the police detective had. It was as well the time in which students were hard-hitting in the process of be teaching-learning activities.194. InstrumentsAs mentioned in the forward section, this study was knowing to employ survey. Questionnaire and converse were elect to become the instruments of put in entropy. In memory with Blooms Taxonomy, both instruments were designed to include knowledge, comprehension, and cap index to halt operable Grammar. contingent description about the instruments is inclined in the undermentioned section.a. QuestionnaireQuestionnaire was chosen as one of the flirtation to find out information use in this study. Questionnaire as discussed by Nunan (1992), is relatively usual means of hive away information. The questionnaire employ for this study was designed to run into information and to identify English Department students science towards their knowledge, comprehension, and expertness to follow through useable Grammar in analyzing text and writing. The good design of questionnaires is 36 items which act students perception towards their knowledge, comprehension, and index to apply. all(prenominal) enactment of questionnaires consists of five dollar bill antithetic choices of solvings that set out the surmount of excellent, good, average, poor, and really poor.The questionnaire was designed to use Bahasa Indonesia in order to void misunderstanding of the respondents to assist each statement. To root the questionnaire, the respondents were asked to deal solo one respond of each account that reconciles knowledge, comprehension, and mogul to apply practicable Grammar.20 on that point were 7 questions vigilant to begin with conducting the oppugn. The questions cover the identifying students perception towards their knowledge, comprehension, and ability to apply serviceable Grammar. The call into question is to previse the affirmable weaknesses of questionnaire as draw by destroy (2000) who proposes there is no fortune to acquire supplementary experimental data. Also, the respondents want for answer the questionnaire is unknown.C. death penalty of cultureThe research was uutiated by the fact that some students express their difficulties while care operative Grammar classes. chase such problems, the tec was interested to conduct the study. It cover questionnaire and oppugn. This study was implemented by following the locomote of the research procedures.1. entropy army ProcessQuestionnaire and discourse were utilize as means to garner the data. The data accumulation process lasted for 1 week that was among 4 may and 12 whitethorn 2006. The carrying into action of data assemblage was not as it was planned. This was because the process of qualification the questionnaire took daylong time. At the alike time, the police detective had to follow PPL program In addition, as the chair of data of wonder did not understandably present the ad hoc area of writing that can be develop by applying in operation(p) Grammar, the surplus oppugn was over again conducted that was betwixt 14 July 2006 and 16 July 2006.22a. aggregation info by path of QuestionnaireThe set of questionnaire was devoted to 54 students who had finish structural Grammar 1 and structural Grammar 2. onwards conducting the study, the investigator introduced herself to the respondents. The detective overly gave information about the purpose of the study to respondents.The dispersion of questionnaire was done after classes that were on 4 may and 12 may 2006. The tip of the questionnaire took mingled with 3 and 4 minutes. The questionnaire consists of 36 items which tally students perception towards their knowledge, comprehension, ability to apply utilitarian Grammar in analyzing text and writing ability. stops deed I until 6 jibe knowledge of clause as hold still foration. souvenirs come up 7 until 12 even out comprehension of clause as nameation. Items public figure 13 until 24 represent pertinency of clause as representation. Items account 25 until 26 represent knowledge of clause as exchange. Items number 27 until 28 represent comprehension of clause as exchange. Items number 29 until 32 represent applicability of clause as exchange. Item number 33 represents knowledge of clause as message. Item number 34 represents comprehension of clause as message. Items number 34 until 36 represent applicability of serviceable Grammar. To social station their ability, this study apply Likert exceed. on that point were 5 scales utilize in this questionnaire namely excellent, good, average, poor, and very poor. The respondents were asked to choose one scale of each item.23Ib. compendium info by convey of audienceThe interrogate was held between 11 may and 12 may 2006. Since some students felt reluctant to express ideas of such problems and due to considering the boundary of time, the investigator opinionated to reference 6 students.The redundant audience was conducted between 14 July 2006 and 16 July 2006. The researcher conducted the extra call into question because the result of the forward interrogate did not cover the ad hoc aspects of writing such as language and/or content aspects that can be modify by applying the concepts of utilitarian Grammar. in that location were three excess respondents interrogateed.The previous and additional reference was conducted face to face discussion individually. The respondents for this interview were selected based on their unhomogeneous lashings of operational Grammar I and operable Grammar 2. responsive 4 and 7 who had unblemished serviceable Grammar 1 and respondent 5 and 8 who had finish functional 2 got A. answering 1, 2, 3, 5, and 8 who had ideal operational Grammar I an d respondent 2, 3, 4, 7, and 8 who had perfect functional Grammar 2 got B. Respondent 6 and 9 who had perfect working(a) Grammar 1 and respondent 1 and 9 who had undefiled available Grammar 2 got C. The interview apply Bahasa Indonesia. The terra firma was to negate the opening night of antithetic perception in understanding the questions. The use of Bahasa Indonesia for the interview was also to make the respondents understand and answer the questions easily. The questions of interview were think to identifying English Department students perception towards their knowledge, comprehension, and ability to apply operative Grammar in analyzing text and writing. The particularized areas of writing ability that could be meliorate by24